Efficacy and Safety of Pegvisomant in the Treatment of Acromegaly.

Pegvisomant, the first and currently only clinically available growth hormone receptor antagonist, is an effective therapeutic option for the medical treatment of acromegaly, a rare disorder characterized by excessive growth hormone secretion. With now over 20 years of real world experience, its safety and efficacy is well-established. However, several aspects of its clinical use are still controversially discussed. The high cost of pegvisomant has limited its use in several countries, and recent studies have reported a lower efficacy than the initial clinical trials. A reported increase in tumor volume under therapy varies between studies and has been attributed to either actual growth or re-expansion after cessation of somatostatin receptor ligand therapy. Furthermore, different combinations of pegvisomant and other therapeutic agents aiming at reduction of acromegaly disease activity have been proposed to increase or retain effectiveness while lowering side effects and cost. This review aims to assess current clinical data on the safety and efficacy of pegvisomant while also addressing controversies surrounding its use.

A pharmacophore screening approach of homeopathic phenols for a renovated design of fragment-optimized Bauhiniastatin-1 as a drug against acromegaly.

OBJECTIVE: Acromegaly is a fatal and chronic disease that is caused by the abnormal secretion of growth hormone (GH) by the pituitary adenoma or pituitary tumor, resulting in an increased circulated concentration of insulin-like growth factors 1 (IGF-1), where in most of the cases it is secreted by a pituitary tumor. Higher levels of GH cause an increase in IGF-1 in the liver leading to multiple conditions such as cardiovascular diseases, glucose imbalance, cancer, and sleep apnea. Medical treatments such as surgery and radiotherapy can be used as the first choice of patients; however, specified human growth hormone control should be an essential treatment strategy due to an incidence rate of 0.2-1.1 yearly. Therefore, the main focus of this study is to develop a novel drug for treating acromegaly by exploiting medicinal plants that have been screened using phenol as a pharmacophore model to identify target therapeutic medicinal plant phenols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The screening identified thirty-four pharmacophore matches of medicinal plant phenols. These were selected as suitable ligands and were docked against the growth hormone receptor to calculate their binding affinity. The candidate with the highest screened score was fragment-optimized and subjected to absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) analysis, in-depth toxicity predictions, interpretation of Lipinski's rule, and molecular dynamic simulations to check the behavior of the growth hormone with the fragment-optimized candidate. RESULTS: The highest docking energy was calculated as -6.5 K/mol for Bauhiniastatin-1. Enhancing the performance of Bauhiniastatin-1 against the growth hormone receptor with fragment optimization portrayed that human growth hormone inhibition can be executed in a more efficient and better way. Fragment-optimized Bauhiniastatin-1 (FOB) was predicted with high gastrointestinal absorption, a water solubility of -2.61 as soluble, and synthetic accessibility of 4.50, achieving Lipinski's rule of 5, with low organ toxicity prediction and interpreting a positive behavior against the targeted protein. The discovery of a de novo drug candidate was confirmed by the docking of fragment-optimized Bauhiniastatin-1 (FOB), which had an energy of -4,070 Kcal/mol. CONCLUSIONS: Although successful and completely harmless, present healthcare treatment does not always eradicate the disease in some individuals. Therefore, novel formulas or combinations of currently marketed medications and emergent phytochemicals will provide new possibilities for these instances.

Identification of growth hormone receptor as a relevant target for precision medicine in low-EGFR expressing glioblastoma.

OBJECTIVE: New therapeutic approaches are needed to improve the prognosis of glioblastoma (GBM) patients. METHODS: With the objective of identifying alternative oncogenic mechanisms to abnormally activated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signalling, one of the most common oncogenic mechanisms in GBM, we performed a comparative analysis of gene expression profiles in a series of 54 human GBM samples. We then conducted gain of function as well as genetic and pharmocological inhibition assays in GBM patient-derived cell lines to functionnally validate our finding. RESULTS: We identified that growth hormone receptor (GHR) signalling defines a distinct molecular subset of GBMs devoid of EGFR overexpression. GHR overexpression was detected in one third of patients and was associated with low levels of suppressor of cytokine signalling 2 (SOCS2) expression due to SOCS2 promoter hypermethylation. In GBM patient-derived cell lines, GHR signalling modulates the expression of proteins involved in cellular movement, promotes cell migration, invasion and proliferation in vitro and promotes tumourigenesis, tumour growth, and tumour invasion in vivo. GHR genetic and pharmacological inhibition reduced cell proliferation and migration in vitro. CONCLUSION: This study pioneers a new field of investigation to improve the prognosis of GBM patients.

First use of gene therapy to treat growth hormone resistant dwarfism in a mouse model.

The only treatment tested for growth hormone receptor (GHR) defective Laron Syndrome (LS) is injections of recombinant insulin-like-growth factor 1 (rhIGF1). The response is suboptimal and associated with progressive obesity. In this study, we treated 4-5-week-old Laron dwarf mice (GHR-/-) with an adeno-associated virus expressing murine GHR (AAV-GHR) injection at a dose of 4 × 1010 vector genome per mouse. Serum growth hormone (GH) levels decreased, and GH-responsive IGF1, IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP3) and acid labile subunit (ALS) increased. There was a significant but limited increase in body weight and length, similar to the response to rhIGF1 treatment in LS patients. All the major organs increased in weight except the brain. Our study is the first to use gene therapy to treat GH-receptor deficiency. We propose that gene therapy with AAV-GHR may eventually be useful for the treatment of human LS.

Pegvisomant and not somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) is first-line medical therapy for acromegaly.

Current guidelines recommend the use of long-acting somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) first when surgery fails to correct GH/IGF-I hypersecretion in patients with acromegaly. In this issue of the journal, a pro- and contra debate will outline which arguments are in favour and which are against positioning pegvisomant (PEGV), a GH receptor antagonist, as the first-line treatment modality of acromegaly. The task of the pros was to promote a paradigm shift towards repositioning PEGV as first-line treatment as PEGV is safe and more effective than the first- and second-generation of SRLs. SRLs, when prescribed together with PEGV can still reduce tumour size when necessary, while they decrease the necessary dose of PEGV by around 50% in the average patient. They conclude that PEGV must move up towards the first-line treatment. For the cons, SRLs remain the first-line medical treatment. Indeed, even if, in recent studies, the remission rate is lower than initially claimed, SRLs are still effective not only for normalizing GH/IGF-I levels in half of the patients but also for inducing tumour shrinkage, improving comorbidities and headaches and reversing excess mortality. They are more convenient for use with their monthly administration and have a remarkable safety profile as demonstrated by the very prolonged experience acquired by more than 30 years of use. Finally, the cost-effectiveness of first-generation SRLs is better than that of PEGV. For all these reasons, cons consider that SRLs remain the best first medical treatment in patients requiring medical therapy.

Could different treatment approaches in acromegaly influence life expectancy? A comparative study between Bulgaria and Campania (Italy).

BACKGROUND: Mortality in acromegaly strictly depends on optimal control of GH and IGF1 levels. Modern medical therapy with somatostatin analogs (SSAs) and GH receptor antagonists (GHRAs) is not available in many countries due to funding restrictions. This retrospective, comparative, cohort study investigated the impact of different treatment modalities on disease control (GH and IGF1) and mortality in acromegaly patients. METHODS: Two cohorts of patients with acromegaly from Bulgaria (n=407) and Campania, Italy (n=220), were compared, and mortality rates were evaluated during a 10-year period (1999-2008). RESULTS: The major difference in treatment approach between cohorts was the higher utilization of SSAs and GHRAs in Italy, leading to a decreased requirement for radiotherapy. Significantly more Italian than Bulgarian patients had achieved disease control (50.1 vs 39.1%, P=0.005) at the last follow-up. Compared with the general population, the Bulgarian cohort had a decreased life expectancy with a standardized mortality ratio (SMR) of 2.0 (95% CI 1.54-2.47) that was restored to normal in patients with disease control - SMR 1.25 (95% CI 0.68-1.81). Irradiated patients had a higher cerebrovascular mortality - SMR 7.15 (95% CI 2.92-11.37). Internal analysis revealed an independent role of age at diagnosis and last GH value on all-cause mortality and radiotherapy on cerebrovascular mortality. Normal survival rates were observed in the Italian cohort: SMR 0.66 (95% CI 0.27-1.36). CONCLUSIONS: Suboptimal biochemical control was associated with a higher mortality in the Bulgarian cohort. Modern treatment options that induce a strict biochemical control and reduce the necessity of radiotherapy might influence the life expectancy. Other factors, possibly management of comorbidities, could contribute to survival rates.

Hormonas y baloncesto. Revisión (I) / Hormones and basketball. Review (I)

No disponible

New insights into growth hormone receptor function and clinical implications.

Although used as a therapeutic for 50 years, it is only recently that the application of molecular techniques has provided a basis for understanding growth hormone's (GH) clinical actions. This article reviews progress in our current knowledge of the molecular mechanism of growth hormone (GH) receptor activation based on a number of physicochemical techniques, and documents insights gained into the means used by the activated GH receptor to control the expression of genes regulating growth and metabolism. These findings are related to disorders of short stature, and the therapeutic consequences are summarized.

[Pegvisomant--growth hormone receptor antagonist in the treatment of acromegaly]. / Pegvisomant--antagonista receptora hormonu wzrostu w leczeniu akromegalii.

INTRODUCTION: Pegvisomant, growth hormone (GH) antagonist is a new perspective in the treatment of acromegaly. Pegvisomant interferes with GH action by competitive binding to receptor and blocking signal transduction. We present first experiences with treatment acromegaly with pegvisomant in Poland. Aim of the study was to assess pegvisomant efficacy in treatment patients with persistent acromegaly after transspheno-ideal surgery and unsatisfactory disease control with somatostatin analogue octreotide (OCTR). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Material consisted of 10 patients (6 M, 4 F) aged 24-48 with active acromegaly, after neurosurgery, in which OCTR was ineffective in disease control. Patients with glucose metabolism disturbances were assigned to group receiving PEG. Controls were matched for age, sex, disease history, GH and IGF-1 levels. Patients received pegvisomant throughout 12 weeks, then combined therapy with PEG and OCTR-LAR was started for 8 weeks and then OCTR-LAR alone was given for next 8 weeks. Controls were medicated with OCTR-LAR 30 mg each 4 weeks during study. Clinical symptoms and IGF-1 level, fasting glucose and HbA(1c) was measured to assess treatment efficacy. RESULTS: Pegvisomant reduced IGF-1 after first week of therapy from 1270+/-229 to 759+/-223 (40%, p<0.04). Prolonged therapy led to further IGF-1 decrease. After 12 weeks of treatment IGF-1 was significantly lower in comparison to initial as well as to controls (604 mg/l vs. 1270 and 1330, respectively, p<0.02). Combined therapy with PEG and OCTR-LAR was not superior to PEG alone. During treatment with pegvisomant improvement of glucose metabolism was seen, as well as decrease in insulin doses required. No adverse events was recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Pegvisomant--GH receptor antagonist--effectively lowers IGF-1 concentration and improves disease control in patients with acromegaly after unsuccessful surgery and with octreotide unresponsiveness. Significantly improves glucose metabolism. Pegvisomant is indicated in patients with active acromegaly after standard treatment failure, especially in cases of coexistent diabetes mellitus.

Primary GH insensitivity '(Laron syndrome) caused by a novel 4 kb deletion encompassing exon 5 of the GH receptor gene: effect of intermittent long-term treatment with recombinant human IGF-I.

OBJECTIVE: GH insensitivity syndrome (GHIS; Laron syndrome) is clinically characterized by severe postnatal growth failure and very low serum levels of IGF-I despite increased secretion of GH. This mainly autosomal recessive syndrome is clinically indistinguishable from isolated GH deficiency (IGHD). Fifty-one different mutations in the GH receptor (GHR) gene have been discovered, whereas only three deletions causing the disorder have been reported so far. In this report, we describe a consanguineous family from Sri Lanka with a novel deletion of 4097 bp in length encompassing exon 5. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Parents of normal phenotype presented their second child (boy) to our clinic at the age of 7 months with severe growth retardation and the clinical features of IGHD (58 cm, -6.1 standard deviation score (SDS); 5.7 kg, -3.4 SDS). Assessment, however, revealed GHIS with absent GH-binding protein. Thereafter, the patient received intermittent recombinant human IGF-I (rhIGF-I; 80 microg/kg twice daily) treatment prepubertally for 5.5 years. Genomic DNA was extracted for genetic analysis and each exon was PCR amplified individually. Further, in order to amplify the GHR gene from exon 4 to 6, Expand Long Template PCR (Roche) was carried out. In addition, RNA isolation and RT-PCR were performed. RESULTS: Separate PCRs of each of the exons of the GHR gene revealed that exon 5 in the patient was missing. Thereafter, "Long PCR" from exons 4 to 6 revealed a 4097 bp deletion encompassing exon 5, in a homozygous state in the patient and in a heterozygous state in both parents. RT-PCR analysis revealed an exact absence of exon 5 resulting in a frameshift, leading to a stop codon in exon 6, which predicts a truncated, non-functional GHR protein. CONCLUSION: Fifty-one different mutations within the GHR gene causing GHIS have been reported so far. In contrast, only three deletions within the GHR gene are known. We describe a patient suffering from GHIS caused by a novel 4 kb deletion of the GHR gene encompassing exon 5 and, additionally, we focus on the effect of intermittent rhIGF-I treatment during prepuberty.

Insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance improve in patients with acromegaly converted from depot octreotide to pegvisomant.

AIM AND METHOD: Insulin resistance leading, in some cases, to glucose intolerance is an important contributory factor to the cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with acromegaly. The aim of this study was to document changes in insulin sensitivity (IS) in a group of seven patients with acromegaly (three male, four female, mean+/-s.d. age 59+/-13 Years) treated initially with a stable dose of depot octreotide (OT; median dose 30 mg four times weekly, range 10-30 mg) for a median of 18 Months (range 16-19 Months) and who were then transferred to treatment with pegvisomant (median dose 15 mg daily, range 10-20 mg) for a median of 8 Months (range 7-9 Months). IS was assessed by homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) using fasting glucose and insulin concentrations and by a short insulin tolerance test (sITT). Body composition was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: Mean+/-s.d. serum IGF-I concentrations during therapy with OT and with pegvisomant were not statistically different (283+/-119 ng/ml on OT vs 191+/-39 ng/ml on pegvisomant (P=0.4)). However, mean+/-s.d. fasting plasma glucose fell from 6.2+/-1.0 mmol/l on OT to 5.2+/-0.6 mmol/l on pegvisomant (P=0.017) and was lower on pegvisomant in all seven patients. In four patients, fasting plasma glucose fell from values diagnostic of diabetes mellitus or impaired fasting glucose on OT to within the normal range on pegvisomant. Mean+/-s.d. peripheral IS (by sITT) increased from 139+/-39 micromol/l per min on OT to 169+/-59 micromol/l per min on pegvisomant (P=0.037). Mean+/-s.d. IS (by HOMA %S) was unchanged over the course of the study (149.1+/-43.7% on OT vs 139.9+/-76.6% on pegvisomant, P=0.28). Mean+/-s.d. pancreatic beta-cell secretory function (HOMA %B) improved significantly on pegvisomant compared with OT (49.4+/-19.2% vs 82.4+/-43.5%, P=0.01). No statistically significant change in total fat (P=0.3), % fat (P=0.28) or circulating non-esterified fatty acids (P=0.35) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: IS and glucose tolerance improved in patients converted from OT therapy to pegvisomant, without a change in body composition and even when serum IGF-I concentrations remained equally well controlled. This may be an important factor in the choice of medical therapy for patients with acromegaly.

Long-term treatment of acromegaly with pegvisomant, a growth hormone receptor antagonist.

BACKGROUND: Pegvisomant is a new growth hormone receptor antagonist that improves symptoms and normalises insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) in a high proportion of patients with acromegaly treated for up to 12 weeks. We assessed the effects of pegvisomant in 160 patients with acromegaly treated for an average of 425 days. METHODS: Treatment efficacy was assessed by measuring changes in tumour volume by magnetic resonance imaging, and serum growth hormone and IGF-1 concentrations in 152 patients who received pegvisomant by daily subcutaneous injection for up to 18 months. The safety analysis included 160 patients some of whom received weekly injections and are excluded from the efficacy analysis. FINDINGS: Mean serum IGF-1 concentrations fell by at least 50%: 467 mg/L (SE 24), 526 mg/L (29), and 523 mg/L (40) in patients treated for 6, 12 and 18 months, respectively (p<0.001), whereas growth hormone increased by 12.5 mg/L (2.1), 12.5 mg/L (3.0), and 14.2 mg/L (5.7) (p<0.001). Of the patients treated for 12 months or more, 87 of 90 (97%) achieved a normal serum IGF-1 concentration. In patients withdrawn from pegvisomant (n=45), serum growth hormone concentrations were 8.0 mg/L (2.5) at baseline, rose to 15.2 mg/L (2.4) on drug, and fell back within 30 days of withdrawal to 8.3 mg/L (2.7). Antibodies to growth hormone were detected in 27 (16.9%) of patients, but no tachyphylaxis was seen. Serum insulin and glucose concentrations were significantly decreased (p<0.05). Two patients experienced progressive growth of their pituitary tumours, and two other patients had increased alanine and asparate aminotransferase concentrations requiring withdrawal from treatment. Mean pituitary tumour volume in 131 patients followed for a mean of 11.46 months (0.70) decreased by 0.033 cm(3) (0.057; p=0.353). INTERPRETATION: Pegvisomant is an effective medical treatment for acromegaly.